Unit Test Results - 2026-05-08 (Non-Podcast Scope)

Execution Context

  • Command: npm run test:automation
  • Runtime: local PowerShell terminal
  • Workspace: s:/code/git-going-with-github
  • Scope: non-podcast readiness and reliability checks

Expected Outcome

  • Unit tests complete successfully.
  • No failing tests in readiness-critical suites.
  • Added readiness/reliability tests validate current runbook and release-gate language.

Proven Outcome

  • Total tests: 99
  • Passed: 99
  • Failed: 0
  • Skipped: 0

Result: PASS

Revalidation:

  • Full rerun after adding student reset/recovery automation also passed at 99/99.

What Was Validated by This Run

  1. Challenge inventory and numbering consistency:
  • 16 core challenge templates
  • 5 bonus templates
  • Complete numbering/lettering coverage
  1. Challenge quality gates:
  • Required evidence fields and troubleshooting guidance
  • Core and bonus template quality checks
  1. Classroom setup consistency:
  • Assignment docs and autograding JSON integrity
  • Required scripts and template files present
  • Classroom README deployment section coverage
  1. Workflow configuration readiness:
  • Concurrency settings in key workflows
  • Critical permissions in bot/progression workflows
  1. Registration readiness:
  • Workflow logic includes registration, duplicate, and waitlist paths
  • Registration issue form template exists
  1. QA gate integrity:
  • E2E runbook includes no-go gates and reliability matrix sections
  • Top-level go-live guide includes non-podcast readiness gate checks

Defects Found During Initial Run and Resolved

  1. Brittle assertion mismatch in new runbook gate test:
  • Cause: expected wording did not match final runbook phrasing.
  • Fix: updated test to assert actual required phrasing in runbook.
  1. Registration template name assertion too strict:
  • Cause: regex did not account for quoted/suffixed template title.
  • Fix: relaxed assertion to match real template naming format.

After fixes, full suite passed.

Remaining Risk After Local Unit Tests

Local unit testing does not fully prove hosted-environment behavior for:

  • GitHub Classroom acceptance timing and repo provisioning.
  • Organization-level policy impacts on Actions permissions.
  • Bot response latency under GitHub Actions queue pressure.
  • Human challenge recovery quality in real student scenarios.

These are covered by mandatory live gates in:

Recommendation

Treat this result as strong local readiness evidence.

Do not declare final go-live readiness until live environment gates and human reliability gates are also complete.

Authoritative Sources

Use these official references when you need the current source of truth for facts in this chapter.

Section-Level Source Map

Use this map to verify facts for each major section in this file.